Providing Assurance on Performance Reports: Two jurisdictions compared
by Peter Wilkins and John Mayne
December 2002
Introduction
Providing assurance on performance reports is an emerging role for public
sector auditors (Mayne, J and Wilkins, P 2004. Believe it or not?:
The Emergence of Performance Information Auditing. Chapter in Quality
Matters: Seeking Confidence in Evaluation, Auditing and Performance Reporting
edited by R Schwartz and J Mayne, Transaction Publishers New Brunswick).
Barzelay (1997) calls this "performance information audit".
Performance information auditing can be located on a spectrum someway
between assurance on financial information and reporting on value-for-money
(vfm). It shares a focus on performance with vfm studies and has the particular
benefit of helping Parliamentarians, the Government, agencies and the
community focus their attention on areas where performance and accountability
can be improved. It also shares with the financial assurance role the
purpose of assuring the quality of core information.
Western Australia is the earliest known case where the Parliament formalised
a requirement for the Auditor General to provide Opinions on the performance
indicators reported by agencies. The Federal Parliament of Canada has
more recently required the Auditor General to provide assessments of the
performance reports of three agencies.
This paper overviews the audit approaches in these two jurisdictions
and makes some observations on some of the significant similarities and
differences, and their implications. It is based on the observations of
the authors and reports such as Auditor General of Western Australia 1994,
1996,1999 & 2000; Auditor General of Canada 2000.
Information on the experiences in other jurisdictions can be obtained
from reports such as Auditor General of Australia 2001a, 2001b; General
Accounting Office 2000; Auditor General of Victoria 2001; Controller and
Auditor General of New Zealand 2001; National Audit Office 2000, 2001;
Office of the Auditor General of British Columbia 2001.
Click here to
view the full report (Adobe PDF)
|